What kind of reasoning is this? Jones must of been clean post Hall because a bunch of guys on a boxing forum thinks so?:huh That's not even close...
-The Nunn fight was put on the table for Jones in: 95, 97, 98 and 99. You cannot use the he was going up to hw as a excuse for Jones consistently...
1: Jones at the peak of his powers struggled with Harding 2: Jones had recovered from the weight loss by Tarver II.
Because Calzaghe at that stage of his career was a adjustment fighter like jmm. He went into the ring with a general outline, rather than a fixed...
????? Benn in that very same interview would then say he would love to fight Jones as well.
-He had already enquired about the Holyfield fight BEFORE he was ordered to fight Nunn, by the WBC. -He made a offer to Nunn which was rejected...
Toney wore down Nunn with counter rights which he timed with Nunn's right jab. Jones doesn't use that punch in that way If you are struggling...
:huh:huh:huh
Yeah. I have to agree with this
???????? If that's your arguments than Ottke should get in as well. Calzaghe spent the bulk of his career defending a belt which even the hof did...
I give McCallum a very good chance. I noticed he was countering Jones during their fight when he was waay past it. But there is a good chance...
:good
1: I really don't think Calzaghe did enough to get into the HOF. 2: Jones deserves to get into the HOF
Griffin dived in the first Jones fight. It makes no sense for him to get a p4p ranking for doing that. Griffins career crashed after he split...
The vast majority of your posts are biased. Full of your (unfounded )opinions
