my original point was Whyte isn't more than marginally better than career journeyman chisora. neither is top level. never were, never will be.
unless Kovalev gets big money for Yarde, there is absolutely no reason to take that fight. it'll be like Monte Barrett popping Owen Becks cherry.
i don't care what you think of wilder. i think he is subpar myself. still better than chisora and whyte though. chisora is at least willing to get...
this will flop. but then again i still can't believe fury-wilder did even a third of what they say. who knows? maybe it will sell.
i said the first one was questionab;e enough that people on here disputed it. whyte was losing the second fight convincingly, until the late ko....
they both have a history of roadblocks and barriers to matches. neither guy is exactly a "takes on all comers" kinda fighter.
you are no service. you are bigging up a guy who has zero notable wins, in order to big up a guy who went life and death with him twice.
i watched the second fight. that was enough of those two bums for me.
when you pull your fat out of the fire with a ko. chisora-takam, or even better weaver tate. elaborating on their nationality? because odds are...
i never once heard anyone say he was the best American HW since Ali. he was mostly not mentioned outside of boxing telecasts.
that is his entire career thus far.
Cojanu is horrible. Parker and a few others exposed themselves by not planting this stiff early.
since the 4th and 5th best are nearly 40 year olds, Povetkin and Pulev, it is actually pretty pathetic.
his best was 6-7 years ago. you are overrating them because they are Brits. Chisora's signature win was a lucky ko in a fight he was getting...
i respectfully disagree.
