probably the two biggest named euro heavyweights before the more recent burst. both very good with controversial losses.
frazier looks like the silver lining being how good he was. maybe pepperment frazier?
haha thanks:lol: i wouldent know what world titles is legit though. as some times the real champs and contenders cant fight for even the major...
virgil hill was 42 winning the cruiserweight belt.
archie probably oldest to retain which is just as hard. how about the spaniard javier castello?
yeah, to be honest me too. i think he did well against viruet too.
even more then bernard hopkins?
i think he did really well against ray lampkin and a boxer from japan.
zack padilla, i hear so many interesting things about him but i never him fight. i must have checked youtube at least a dozen time for his video.
here are some that i think would most likley be wars, barkley-mccellan fenech-d. lopez tyson-ibeabuchi glenn johnson-charles williams...
i dont know how many fighters at middleweight had the legs to keep up with roy for 12rounds. bernard hopkins may not have been the veteran great...
jerry quarry is one of the toughest heavyweight that i have ever seen. he took absolute beatings and hung in as long as he could even in very very...
i think this would have been a interesting matchup if they met in their primes. both physically strong fighters, ruddock the more devastating but...
i deffinetely agree with bivins and petrolle. i think baby arizmendi deserves mention, great fighter.
i was reading tigeredge's great post and it got me thinking. here is something worth mentioning, the division was weak at the time but...
