It's 1982. Tony Sibson fights Juan Roldan in an eliminator for Hagler's crown. Who wins this tearup?
Agree on the first fight...basically too one sided to be a great fight
prince naz
Sugar really is a crushing bore. He talks over the other (far more interesting) guests on ESPN Ringside and has nothing really to say except...
"Managers etc have to come out with excuses for their fighter "...you see I never mentioned Hearns himself. Tommy was a class act, agreed. The...
Well I just don't buy the whole weakened leg thing, especially coz of this mysterious leg massage. If you watch the fight, Hearns stumble in the...
If ever there was a bogus excuse for losing a fight it has to be that ****ing massage story. I mean yeah, if he hadn't had the leg rub Hagler...
I assume we are talking ring smarts here? It has to be Frank Bruno. Frank had skills and a good punch, but was completely clueless when the...
Fair enough, it appeared you were insinuating that you thought Hagler lost that fight. I was wrong on that count. Anyway, try and remain...
Sorry what's your point? Are you suggesting that fight was an all out war? I thought for the first 10 rounds Hagler put on a CLINIC. After that...
Far from upset, Conteh, having a very good time debating with you guys. I would assume the thread refers to Hagler at his peak, surely?...
Well he's taking plenty of punishment on this board. And are you seriously suggesting Hagler was an experienced fighter when he first met Monroe?
Vito won? Yep and the Queen of England is a man.
What's all this evaluation of Hagler before he won the title? What's your point? Let's all base Tyson's ablility on his subdued perfomance...
1982/3
