Norris was a better boxer than Shane, but Shane had the power to take out a bad chinned fighter so I'm not sure who would win.
That combo was fast as hell.
Damn RIP, he was a great fighter.
Yeah Willie The Worm may have the only one to really beat him but a prime Hagler 80-85 was tough to beat.
No Mayweather pulled this off close, Berto lost.
A man with sense.
Another thing about Starling was his hands were really fast. He matched Curry's hand speed in the beginning of the second fight. He just didn't...
The judges got the decision wrong, McGirt won the fight on my card. McGirt isn't a good fighter but he should have got the decision.
He was knocked out by a guy who was not a puncher.
Definite glass chin.
Germaine Sanders is not easy to stop.
Your hatin on Starling. Starling when he wasn't clowning around too much was a tough boxer. He was tough too beat and was similar to Winky...
Robinson had better one punch power than Tito but not Hearns and Cuevas.
Shane is not Donald Curry. Donald Curry was defensive and was a very good boxer. Shane is a slugger with speed and that's not good against...
I'm going with Kirkland by KO.
