no of course
frazier was better in every single department except right hand
yes, foreman being 42 and being much more competitive against evander in his absolute peak and tyson geting ****d by an old version of holyfield...
another stupid post.. jesus where are the smart tyson fans? also... foreman went life and death with alext stewart and savarese? this guy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJurFlEbCUg uh yes ali looks taller than foreman lol
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl so you post this garbage and you think that you will convince anyone? it is the ****ing angle of the camera,...
i have been next to holyfield and he is taller than me, i am 6´1( 1,86) and ali is clearly taller than holyfield, so you wrong, and foreman was...
so you are the classic idiot who use mistakes of fighters when they were not in their primes and then you uses it to make a point against them...
:rofl
i agree, but to be fair liston was in his prme in the era of john l sullivan
ali was 6´3 and he never ever looked taller than foreman
the dumbest comment on the thread
first of all , 1972 foreman was not prime foreman, you use the very best version of tyson against a green foreman, still i go with george by ko
:rofl:rofl:rofl i could not imagine 2 men easier for tyson than these 2
