Depends what you are classing as "stepping up". I think the only fighters that stand out are Lennox and Byrd, and he lost those fights.
I agree. And I agree that Vitali has a good chin also. All I said was we can't call it "great" on the evidence we have so far.
Both were on the wrong side of 35, both were overweight, both wobbled him and one stopped him. Lennox took flush shots from Tyson and Tua and...
I love it when people try to sound smart by using words they don't know the meaning of and can't even spell correctly. :happy
Again, my point stands. He hasn't taken flush punches from ENOUGH top contenders to make a judgement on his chin. Hundreds of journeymen with...
Like I said, apology accepted. :hi: Antiquated tripe? Do you even know what "antiquated" means? Care to explain how it applies here? :think
And the uppercut hurt him. He held on for a little while afterwards. But the uppercut is not typically a "KO" punch anyway, it's a set-up punch....
So why quote him to back up your point? :think Vitali's chin is good, but he hasn't faced enough top contenders to make the judgement on whether...
The fight itself is meaningless. An old paper champ against a current paper champ. :-((
So you agree the fight should have been stopped in the 4th? Whatever, show me where I even suggested that you thought the fight shouldn't have...
Yes, Peter is also a loser who made his name by impressively beating nobodies.
George also said, when asked whether the fight should have continued with the cut around the 4th round.... "NO WAY!" So if George knows all, then...
I guess those judges had a "biased agend" too huh? ..whatever the hell a "biased agend" is. :lol: Your username say it all. :yep
Ahem.... [IMG] Apology accepted, ********. :finger
Take a look around..... EVERYBODY is discrediting his opponent. Even Vitali's biggest fans. And why? Because Sam Peter is overrated, overweight,...
