See my first reply :good
Yes it was a gift decision and how can McCloskey be a hypejob when there was hardly any hype surrounding him? You're clutching at straws Dom :good
Here are some differences, Belgecham was just coming off a defeat to Lee and was not worthy of an EBU title shot. :good McCloskey ko'd his...
what an amazing observation Pug1list, :good nothing get's by you.
I thought I was the only one who's not so keen on the Marty Morrissey witch hunt! I'm just happy to have more boxing on tv and especially happy...
This is classic British forum stuff, McCloskey has a bad night but still manages to win and now suddenly all his opposition to date has been ****,...
McCloskey clearly deserved the shot more than Munroe though no matter how the title shots came about. You are trying to discredit McCloskey by...
Funny you bring up Munroe, he may have been a voluntary but he never beat anyone decent at domestic level. He never won the British title but...
He wasn't his best last night but that was an off night, he is way better than that. Khan didn't beat Barerra btw, that fight was a farce so I...
This "Paddy no mark" as you call him has never been blasted out of it in 54 seconds, he doesn't need his team to scour the super featherweight...
:rofl
You come from the Land of the Hypejobs so don't start that **** Dan.
Yeah it's ****ing terrible when the former British and current European champion dares to call for a fight with a ****ing glass chinned fraud who...
Granted it wasn't McCloskey's best performance but in fairness to him and to pick up on your point about Khan, a win over Lauri is more credible...
So you're saying if it wasn't for the fact he lost he would've won :good It's funny how that works!
