Tyson would be a FAR bigger star than Floyd imo. His personality would lend great to things like 24/7 and his KO's would draw casuals from all...
He's getting way overrated by some who believe he'd beat Kovalev and Ward. He's beaten some good opposition. But he's only had 9 fights and has...
I dislike this whole notion that boxing is a business and boxers are businessmen. Boxing is a sport and boxers are athletes. The point of a sport...
No, both not famous enough and doesn't have enough good wins to warrant it. Really he's only well know for losing to Foreman.
If you want to get really technical it belongs to Adonis Stevenson. Hopkins beat Pavlik then Dawson beat Hopkins then Stevenson beat Dawson.
Who's the divisions champion then? I'll agree if you say it's no one.
Exactly! the sport has change so much and added so many titles and weight classes since the old days that it really isn't as much an achievement...
I'm arguing either boxing fans know who the real champ is(Golovkin), or there is no champ at 160.
Hopkins beat Pavlik before:good
If you are arguing Cotto is the champion then who did Martinez beat to become the man? because it certainly wasn't Hopkins who had beat the man.
Ok I will then:good and most would agree with me
Here I have a different example which is interesting. When Tyson and Spinks fought who was the champion?
Hopkins and Ward called out Floyd as well. Your point is moot.
To boxing fans it is. So do you think Stevenson is the champ at 175 or KOvalev?
Martin Murray, who beat Martinez at 160 for the lineal title.Judges be damned.
