eight? http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488153&page=10 eight potential HEADBANGER snitches on one thread? this has to be some sort...
another potential HEADBANGER squealer. http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488153&page=10 i believe thats seven on one thread. seven?
please tell us how what fights you bet on to achieve your vcash of 1000 that you ridicule other here when they have a lessor amount? surely you...
so we now have, including myself, six potential HEADBANGER squealers? on one thread? on a thread started by HEADBANGER himself?
and yet another HEADBANGER potential squealer http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488153&page=17
and yet another candidate for a HEADBANGER squealer. http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488153&page=7
and yet another potential HEADBANGER squealer http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488153
heres another http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488153
heres one. http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488153&page=9
how is making a reference to intentionalbutt captioning his own post a "squeal to the mods" and "crying for help" as you say? why would i need to...
making a reference to a previous post is not talking to yourself. no wonder you are clamoring about a fake award in a fake team elite awards...
if floyd can move down to 140 and concurrently hold the belts at 140, 147 and 154 floyd would not only have a case to be considered an ATG but the...
http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488153&page=19 really? you got beat so bad you couldnt bear to read it anymore. and why would you...
now since your sub-80 iq cannot comprehend that i am captioning this post to make reference to a question i posed to you earlier can you please...
look idiot, captioning your post is not talking to yourself. it is making a reference to something that someone is clearly trying to avoid
