Outside the ring is irrelevant. Tyson, Monzon etc show that. The other, apart from Finnigan and Lopez (Ahumada to an extent), I dont see it.
Turpin beat a better fighter than all of them, doesnt mean Id rank him higher. Arguably a weight drained Curry.
Not as many consistently. Plus he's had longer to get in.
Hamed for me, excellent record and brought excitement and international appeal which counts to an extent in the IBHOF.
It wasn't a justification for Fury to be ranked higher. I was saying it's irrelevant if you think he could win now, he didn't when they fought.
So much better than the abomination at the top of the page.
Yeah but that's also irrelevant because when he actually did face him he lost. It's a results business, no excuses.
What the **** are the Klitschkos doing there? I’m not even trying to wind up their fans, that is awful. Who the **** has Vitali beat? He...
accept* :-(
Researches his articles well though.
You don't like him? Or querying the 'modern' tag? If so I meant still writing.
Springs Toledo is a good modern writer.
Impressive riposte.
The public is arguably more influenced by the Sun than any other paper.
I though ****** 'wrote' in the Sun? You'd think they'd support his boxer.
