Controversial wins don't do a damn thing for arguments backing a fighter.
If Canelo was beating these type of guys at 154 Floyd would have never fought him.
This has no bearing on Floyd in any way. This isn't the same Canelo.
It bothered me that he seemed to concede the last two rounds, as if he had a sizable lead. It was a ****ing winnable fight for him.
I have a feeling that when I rewatch the fight, that I may have Canelo winning clearly.
I expected him to do enough to make it close, but come up short, and then to say that he thought he won. He fought in a similar manner for the...
Andrade doesn't have Jacobs' power but he is a more athletic boxer, with a snappier jab.
His jab is pawing and not snappy. Although he did land the best shot of the fight. He allows himself to get outworked in the big fights.
Judges been fair to Jacobs. His ass did the same **** against Golovkin. Got outworked in too many rounds.
7-5 Canelo or 6-6
6-5 Alvarez
5-5
5-3 Alvarez
4-3 Alvarez
4-1 Alvarez putting on a defensive clinic