Regardless, many people and those in the press corps didn't watch the HBO broadcast and scored Round 1 for Pacquiao. Go do a little research....
I had it 10-2. 10 and 11 to Bradley.
I'd like you to meet a few folks who think you're a ****ing moron. Chris Manix, Sports Illustrated: 115-113 Pacquiao Lem Satterfield, Ring...
You're wrong. They were not the three closest rounds in the fight.
Really, it was because of the HBO commentators? So how do you explain 99% of the press who scoring that fight for Pacquiao while watching it in...
:lol:
I disagree with you. Has nothing to do with Compubox or HBO announcing. These guys disagree with you as well. Chris Manix, Sports...
I've been following and practicing the sport since Holmes/Cooney. How bout yourself, genius?
It's obviously a black thing, and to some extent a Latino thing. That, and a 'they don't really know **** about the sport in or out of the ring'...
This is a hard sell. Guy fights almost his entire career at 140. Has two bouts at 147 recently. Now he's fighting for the title at 154 with no...
118-110, the first time around I watched it on BoxNation. I have Bradley winning 10 and 11. Argument can be made for 1 and 12, little guy.
Okay, then almost the entire boxing world is ignorant when it comes to scoring fights.......or you are. Which one do you think is more likely? :deal
The two bouts are in no way comparable. It's intellectually dishonest to claim otherwise. One was a competitive and and closely fought battle. In...
And still won the round.
You're a fool and/or a coward.
