One fight in four, maybe.
That was at welterweight.
A very strange post. Especially when you knew nothing of Gavilan five minutes ago.
When was it then? :huh
Alright well if you mean Hagler versus a lightweight Duran - that's 160 vs 135 - then it has to be Hagler by late stoppage, surely?
Duran was in his prime versus Hagler. As far as being a middleweight goes, anyway. He was focused and in good shape. So was Hagler, actually....
I don't think cuts should dominate the equation - Napoles didn't get cut that much. ****, Willie Pep cut more easily than Napoles. Napoles knew...
I'm glad a good debate has been sparked. Even though this isn't about Jose Napoles, he's being sold slightly short. He wasn't big for a...
'SwhatIthought, *****.
I think Gavilan actually matches up well with Hearns. A great chin to take the shots. Great stamina to up the work rate. Speed to actually catch...
When did you become this annoying?
It does seem Gavilan & Robinson's peaks were slightly separated. I'd bet on the 1951 Gavilan to fare a bit better against a 1948 Robinson, if only...
Who'd beat Gavilan at 147lbs?
Gavilan is too good for most come forward fighters.
Yeah I know mate, I used to own that fight. A good exhibition of refined stalking from Williams. I think I remember McVey saying he'd seen one...
