:lol: like who, Micheal Nunn? the truth is there was nobody but punching bag Kalule & Howard, and Lalonde which all amount to low quality...
yes, and also notice how they stay away from the Norris Brown rematch. They simply cant acknowledge the way terry made easy work of brown far...
that's like trying to prove rey would whip terry in his prime the burden of proof is yours yet again good luck
better to ask how many did he fight? what we call slim pickings it really shouldnt have taken him 11 to dispose of bonds think what...
there's reason they called him terrible and that reason is the pain & humiliation he caused sugar rey Oh look, the score! Norris 120 srl...
no but he definitely had Chavez whipped. he was robbed by an incompetent referee
i dont quite believe it either. he mentioned nothing of Hearns and that alone makes me suspicious Best jab should go to Hearns since it almost...
i cant believe some of the adults here; they're so lacking in grey matter It's like outsmarting ten year olds
you missed something fact = Norris 120 srl 106 = truth hurts and now you have a complete set!
Norris beats lennard every time Styles
you have to admit, my claim is a lot stronger than yours You still havent said why a fighter who takes 11 rds for impotent Bonds, can take out...
you can do better than that
:lol: moronic Your boy gets a 120-106 lacing and you somehow confuse my gloating with jealosy? your boy was the one who ducked Nunn We...
but my opinion is based on the thorough way he (Norris) actually handled him Add to the fact that lennard was never able to deal with movers...
great post Foxy. I couldnt have said it better myself of course, the simple minded dissenters will chalk it up "just hatin" the thread...
