let's see; if fighter A beats fighter C but loses to fighter B.... BULLSPIT! I seen that article back in a 1984 KO mag and the idea spread...
no worse than rey being man handled by Camacho, a guy three sizes smaller :lol: next to srl, hector resembled a raging bull and I'm just...
youre not going to shake anyone's confidence with arguments like that you cant prove anything by comparisons between different fighters from...
leonard had the far better chin which is why Terry dropped him twice and Terry stayed upright w/o so much as blinking ray's comp was far...
people like you are to easily impressed by 32-0 records. other than Cuevas, who was there? Weston, faded as he was, was already making Tommy...
yea well Leonard hadnt lost a bout in 11yrs before the Norris bout and look what Terry did to him If you like giving Leonard his due for a...
to the untrained eye that is! :hey
other than Caveman Lee, yes otherwise, SRL would have taken the fight in 1982 and Thomas Hearns would not have lasted a mere 3 rds. Hamsho...
vastly overrated alot of guts but no speed, little movement, and he cant get out of the way what little he lands, wont cause George to do...
Yes, only a couple. a few not needed
Terry on the other hand, was not one of those stupid or immobile stiffs like Bonds, and smartly boxed N moved his way to a 120-106 route :smoke
why would it take prime leonard 11 rounds just for Bonds? just asking
the Norris & Camacho bouts will forever mar his reputation as a good boxer/counterpuncher, but who couldnt handle speed
Norris handled that fake in most righteous fashion Norris was slick, quick, and made Ray leonard sick!
and wants Lalonde's two belts, one of which he never owned a fake from start to end
