any fighter that needs 11 rounds to put away Larry Bonds is by definition, mediocre or not much above it
1982 and it's not even close. The introduction of Camacho, Rafeal Limon had regained the title and even the prelims were awesome
Oh HELL YEAH! Norris, who else!
Leonard doesnt have enough speed for Terry and it took him 11 rds for Bonds. not good! Altho leonard has the ability to up his game and turn up...
yeah I examined their records Leonard's reads: UD L 12 Norris and Norris' reads: UD W 12 Leonard regarding their competition, that needs...
yes becuz he faced a far better version of Hagler. esentially the true Hagler altho somewhat edited version from superhuman down to near...
You mean lennard at his best never faced anyone with Terry's speed He had his chance with Nunn but couldnt go thru with it. Wonder how come
do you mean the prime lennard who took 11 rounds for Larry Bonds? Side note: why doesnt rey have any defenses in Terry's weight class?
better that than having to explain how prime Leonard (tko 11 Bonds) wins over Norris
Oh you mean this? Norris 120 srl 106 It's a fact that can never be disputed, never gets old, and never goes out of style!
yeah sure kid, we've heard that excuse 100 times 95% of leonard's downfall to Norris can be attributed to Terry's speed, the rest, about 5% to...
February 9, 1991 - a night that will go down in infamy I call it "a wonderful night in the garden"
Let's see, we have a 120-106 score here what do you have?
no it wasnt Camacho was his last fight and no surprise, it was a speedster who knocked him stiff leonard doesnt do well with speedster, even...
they dont have anything going for them Leonard has 0 defenses to terry's ten one guy here brags about Leonard's superior amateur experience...
