Oh yes it does!
froch, bute less physical but clearly burley, just do the math... opponents vs opponents not hard to see a great diff.
and then Burt as he was... people forget Cerdan was near the end of his peak too. Born in 1916, Zale in 1913, Williams in 1915, LaMotta 1922,...
this is the most likely scenario, it just gets down to size which many people haven't & don't discuss all the time when talking about these...
THIS. and more accurately done TOO black lads! first heard about it reading on Joe Gans who often came out the victor.
Armstrong Jackson Charles Marciano
Jock McAvoy v Freddie Steele (1936/37) Bert Gilroy v Tony Zale (1940/41) Lloyd Marshall v Nigel Benn Joe Louis v Mike Tyson thousands of...
based on popularity, hope and excellence but not necessarly the absolute best through their respective years. I'll have a go. Wells Wilde...
CHOI another chance for British boxing not capitalised on at the right time.
these were essentially MWs passing through WW ALL too big for Hammering Hank... Greats all of them but over matched for Henry.
shhhh, there are some guys on here that don't count such things in the scheme of wins & losses, if fact they would'nt even consider the 'facts' on...
I was thinking Marty Servo, but a quick BoxRec check and no it can't be, but that story is very familar Burt, is it that era and those weights WW...
because in reality there could be 500 greatest punchers... list can only account for so many and they are NEVER totally accurate!
I've read quite a few, most of the biographies I found disappointing, however there are some good ones. But by enlarge the best boxing books I...
yes that should be removed from history!
