not now not ever!! his resume is **** and looked horrible against hopkins the guys lack of technique is shocking!!
hell no!!!!!!
hopkins stamina wouldnt be as much of an issue vs jones as he onyl fights sporadically now whereas calzaghe was able to fight at a fast pace every...
thats debatable...if you saw a guy who had an amazing technique he to me would be aesthetically pleasing to the eye whereas guys with horrible...
Not a hopkins fan!! but yeah it was a ***** move but a smart one at that its no different from over exaggerating contact in the penalty area and...
calzaghe got exposed as a no technique limited fighter...when he isnt allowed to let his arms ago he really didnt score much if at all with...
haha i think you'll find calzaghe was frustrated and trying to open up so he flailed his arms like a lunatic in hope of catching him...those...
i'm a big floyd fan but if he fights hatton again i'll lose all respect i had for him.
calzaghe....from an aesthetic pure boxing perspective he's horrible
1)mayweather 2) pac 3) hopkins 4) de la hoya 18743) calzaghe i personally find it impossible to rank de la hoya his achievements are good...
i thought it was much closer than the scorecards had it had bernard winning still though maybe a draw at best for winky
this would be the icing on the crap cake that is mayweather atm i was just getting me head round the idea of the DLH rematch as long as he fights...
what was your scorecard for that fight just out of interest?
anyone else find it tought to analyse and rank oscar...im not doubting his ability but i think hes lost most of his tough fights and IMO got gifts...
i actually feel sorry for cory he's been shunted twice in a row now and everyone turns a blind eye because they find him dull
