so Marquez needs to win specifically by KO because the judges cant do their jobs? typical response from someone with no valid rebuttals.
please re read the opening post. I am making a clear argument. What I personally scored the fight is NOT my argument. I am taking the OFFICIAL...
first person in this thread that deserves the YDKSAB tag.
They only use it when it benefits them. In the second fight MARQUEZ was the champ but pacquiao still got the benefit of the doubt.
the thread is going away from the argument I made please re read the opening post if you forgot my point. basically its Marquez rounds won that...
There is more than one type of robbery. We all know the Williams-Lara type robberies. If a fight is close it does not mean it is not a robbery....
:? And your point is? :patsch:think:rofl When referencing this quote please use YDKSAB. Just remember you heard it here first. Marquez is...
Looking for the KO doesn't mean Ricky Hatton reckless, you can go for the KO with out compromising your defense. He will not be looking to KO PAC...
Never gambled before and wouldn't know where to go. :? See post #5.
He was bulkier has last fight and it didn't affect his stamina. Age can not be used as a factor since Marquez has not shown signs of slowing down...
Marquez does not have one punch KO power but he will pick pacquiao apart with pin point punches and combination. Either Kenny Bayless will step...
Which ONE of his previous opponents qualified as a bigger fish to fry when he fought them?:think
I actually like canelo and donaire. I dislike Garcia, broner is actually pretty entertaining. My point is these 4 in particular have amazing...
I was thinking: Broner Danny Garcia Canelo Donaire
Good answers.
