No, I'm not under that impression. I don't know what gave you that idea.
HEAD TO HEAD? YES!! They are evenly matched at one win each. It's not rocket science. :roll:
he dominated Round 2. Other than that, it was close. Vitali was only winning by one clear round and it was only half way through the fight, so it...
I'd pick Vitali to win the rematch. It wouldn't prove Vitali was better than Lennox, just that he was better than a near-40 year old Lennox....
If a fighter beats another fighter, that's as conclusive as you can get.
A regular KO is basically a stoppage due to injury as well. Just a different type of injury. Bottom line - Byrd and Lennox took their medicine...
SO? The scorecards are only there to determine a winner if one is not decided withing the scheduled distance. In this case the winner WAS...
They fought each other, didn't you know? Byrd won. Therefore head-to-head he is the superior fighter. When you talk head-to-head you ignore all...
I agree totally. Wlad was awesome against Byrd. Completely dominated him. But he still beat Vitali, and this is a thread about Vitali. Chris...
1 post? I wonder whose alias you are..... :think :yep
Read my post properly. I was responding to the poster who said Wlad's losses were to fighters "no worse than other beltholders from different era".
That was great. Byrd was an overrated runner. ... but I thought this was a Vitali thread?
I wasn't trolling, I was presenting a rebuttal Rico's point. :smooch
....and what about Puritty? :think I must have missed the meeting where it was decided that that loss does not exist any more.
