There's nothing I said that was untrue. You could say the same about people who defend Tyson's losses.
What and Tyson didn't have any weaknesses?
Same goes for Louis against Schmeling. Louis didn't take that fight seriously either but you still hold that against him.
If Tyson couldn't hold up against Douglas I very much doubt that he's holding up against Louis
Schmeling is the most underrated fighter in HW history. Schmeling was robbed of the championship in the rematch against Jack Sharkey and was...
Louis had faster hands than Tyson. Tyson didn't have a better chin. Louis was measured with his footwork, he wasn't slow, certainly not slower...
Tunney was better than Conn (who I think Louis underestimated) but I do think that Louis catches up to him. Late KO.
That's wild.
I read an account where Johnson claimed that Walcott beat up Tom Sharkey in sparring real bad. If that's true then I don't think this fight is a...
Louis ko
My bad I got their heights mixed up.
We were talking about skills bud. Why bring in the colour of the guys he fought?
I think they beat him. Beterbiev looks a little slow and robotic to me. I doubt that he'd be dominant in a good era.
That's false. Tunney could fight at mid-range and could throw short punches on the inside when he needed to. He could fight going forward and...
How? What does he do better?
