I voted no because it's the correct answer. He has lost fights in the amateurs, so it's the only correct answer. Get rekt, kid. ;)
He perhaps should have lost Castillo 1, but that's disputable. 48 or 49 wins.
GGG to find a way and not looking particularly good in doing so.
Well, I think Kovalev won more rounds but I agree with Ward more or less stating that he's a simplistic fighter, albeit he's smart and does well...
Well, he wants a much bigger piece of the UFC pie. Maybe this is a bargaining tool for him to get "his share". Or maybe.............
Sad, but expected.
I'd choose Ward second, actually.
An extremely long time. It's time for you to start investing in cryonics. ;)
It's a good argument. The reason I give (at the bare minimum) Ward an edge, other than the fact he's just gone more or less equal with another top...
114-113 Kovalev. Rounds 5,7,8,9,11 and 12 for Ward. Not a robbery. It's good to see you. :thumbsup:
Given how short (albeit already storied) his career has been so far, he's doing quite well. But you're right, he deserves way way more, because...
Ducklerr, I wanted to know last week but didn't see you around: what was your scorecard for Kovalev-Ward?
Based on achievement, he obviously can't yet be #1 - he should certainly jump up a bit though. On skill, we can talk of Lomachenko as arguably...
Lomachenko is simply dazzling. He's dazzling. He dazzles.
Based on accomplishments he still doesn't deserve the title over someone as utterly proven as say, Andre Ward... but from a pure boxing...
