In order to be a top 10 70s heavyweight he would have to be ahead of Holmes Foreman Ali Weaver Coetzee Norton Frazier Young Lyle Tate Among...
Norton was considerably earlier so not the same Ali and most had him winning. Spinks also lost to Coetzee in one round
Many champions have a few guys like that as defenses but they generally also have tough defense against highly ranked contenders. It's not...
Joshua's considerably more accomplished than Cooney though with actual quality wins. Who did Cooney stop via body attack?
Who cares how big they were? Savarese was a journeyman who never cracked the top 10 and Grimsley wasn't even journeyman level. Briggs was...
Foreman didn't fight Lewis and there's no proof he ever would have. Holyfield beating Tyson in 1996 clearly supplanted Foreman giving Foreman's...
He should have defended against Bowe or Holyfield or Lewis. Failing that guys ranked in the top 10 like McCall
They didn't win belts from a guy who had been ducking everyone in the top 10 3 years straight Also Foreman and Moorer are not top 5 90s heavyweights
Sure it takes time but by the time Foreman faced Briggs the public no longer saw him as champ due to 3 years of ducking and refusing to fight...
Foreman and Fury. In other sports you have to consistently prove yourself to stay champ. If the warriors chose to sit out the 2019, 2020, and...
Usyk should easily beat Cooney given he's already beaten numerous guys better than Cooney with better attributes. This is one of the most bizarre...
Most sports require the top guy to prove themselves against the best if they want to stay on top on a regular basis. No reason a champion...
Sure but Louis wasn't known for great defense and was dropped multiple times by guys who were not heavyweights by today's standards. What...
Realistically though guys Tyson beat like Ruddock or Bruno could potentially beat the best guys Foreman beat h2h. Ruddock seems like a horrible...
Charles has way more depth to his resume and was on top for roughly 3 years. Seems reasonable to me if you value depth.
