you keep the numbers We'll take the win Norris 120 Leonard 106
maybe the numbers weren't maybe the experience wasnt but the fight sure was Norris 120 Leonard 106 a blowout and huge difference in...
but they are VERY MUCH in his favor; Norris 120, Leonard 106 as for Leonard being shot, he wasnt shot (see uno mas) It's just that standing...
well then it looks like none of your assumptions have panned out Norris SRl 120-106 it tells the whole story
Just answering the name of the thread Why, you dont like it becuz I give too good an argument for you? actually I've made quite a bit off...
it's like the poor guy's stuck. I've asked him several times before how Ray would force Terry to stand stock still with his gloves at his sides...
I'm not denying Leonard's opposition on the way up was better known than Terry's It was I'm just saying it didnt matter Case in point:...
to get the diabetes, you first have to get the spoon in his mouth But it was Terry who was dispensing with the mouthloads (full of red...
too bad none of that helped him against Norris hey look, I made my point much more strongly than you and with only half the effort! :smoke
that's right, the numbers dont lie Norris 120 Leonard 106 all else is irrelevent :smoke
Terry showed Sugar's deficiencies as a fighter namely that he could not deal with other fast boxers as a pressure fighter, Sugar was just...
well that's because Norris was the cause of leonard's career twighlight You're right about one thing tho, the numbers really were one sided -...
He didnt have problems with Leonard picky selection of opposition would only meaningful if Terry LOST to Leonard actually, it was Leonard's...
that's all nice but what good does it do in the end when you're facing a speeding bullet like Norris and you don't know what to do with him?...
there's nothing incomparable about a 36-3-1 record or 4 title defenses, 3 of them coming against Green, Bonds, & Finch :lol: many fighters...
