tough too say...........i think the 2 fights with ruddock took sumthing out of tyson.....they were supposed to fight nov of 91....tyson ruddock 2...
i like lennox also........... actually mike tyson paid lennox 4 million to fight seldon for the wba title not evander get your facts...
because bonecrusher smith held on for dear life ala akinwande against lewis...if the tyson/bone fight was in the 90s...it woulda been a dq win for...
thats like saying joe loius woulda lost to marciano just like he woulda in his prime..........
yes i agree................ruddock was never the same again
yes lewis was 1 yr older than tyson....but fighters peak at differnt times....tyson peaked 86 to 91 roughly..........and lennox 96 to 2000...
i wouldnt call the tyson who fought holyfield in 96 prime bro....even lennox lewis admitted to me that after tyson came back from jail he wasnt...
no idea what your saying
thats because 19 brutal rds with tyson softened ruddock up for lewis....a broken jaw a broken rib didnt help ruddock....he was never the same...
not bitter american................ i live in portugal.....been watching fights since ali/holmes.............tyson of 2002..........was not the...
even the non prime tyson that showed up against razor ruddock woulda broke lennox lewis down and knocked him out in 6 rds.............perhaps...
go watch ruddock/odum........... the over hand right didnt hurt odum at all
RITE ON THE MONEY:good:good:good...............FOREMAN WAS JUST THAT MUCH OF A BAD ASS
evander holyfield in his prime would never have lost to either klit bros.....he went on way to long but the real deal is an atg......
i wonder if u can tell every one on esb what conformist means????
