er...if b-hop ain't number at the end of 1992...& he ain't number 1 at the end of 1993...& he wasn't really close to number 1 in either & the same...
you said b-hop was the number 1 mw in the world. he wasn't. he was just the guy ranked number 1 contender by the ibf.
ibf no.1 contender. & you reckon that makes b-hop the number 1 mw in the world? :lol::lol::lol::lol: ******.
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine%27s_Annual_Ratings:_1992...
no he wasn't. he was miles off. don't chat ****.
it wasn't made public until he brought it up himself in his own autobiography. so where did you get that doctors report?
losing a split decision because of 2 fairly dubious points deductions that decided the result isn't getting "smoked". if this was a wide ud...
he's a guy who does voluntary work in outreach programs affiliated with the ibf & he had blagged a free ticket? i knew he wasn't a ****ing "ibf...
yeah. that has nothing to do with what i said. clazaghe won 4 titles compared to ottke's 2 & achieved more at 168. can't deny that.
thus winning 4 168 belts to ottke's 2? so he "achived" more? :deal i will also add that he beat better opposition & did better against...
i don't think he really is an ibf official tho. he certainly had no official role on the night.
i must have missed ottke winning all 4 belts. :patsch
that fat bloke looks **** all like artisst. artisst is the fella sitting next 2 seats down from hatman isn't he?
uh...no he isn't.
that win always looked better on paper. toney was a mess that night. his record at the time flattered him too tbf. he'd had a few gifts &...
