you don't know what "stopped" means. :lol::lol::lol:
if you think taylor was anywhere near his best when he fought froch you must not have followed his career.
er...do you not know what "stopped" means? or are you trolling? :huh
what a loaded question. it's like saying "who has the better best win: buster douglas or wladimir klitschko?" then using that to insinuate that...
well he clearly wasn't "prime" against mccall. he was an accident waiting to happen under pepe & everyone knew it. he was clearly out of shape...
counter argument to what? i don't think that wlad was "prime" when he got knocked down or beat. you seem a bit stoopid. :nut
perfect example of the reason why the word "prime" has become meaningless. misuse by ******s to further agendas. lennox was not at his best,...
including himself? :huh
this. & so blatantly this that i'm shocked anyone says anything different. good post. :good maybe it's cos i don't rate sanders at...
bute's problem has been making fights. he's a good fighter. he may not have faced the best opposition so far but he doesn't look like a guy who is...
holy ****...a reasonable post about david haye. :good i'd pick holy over haye at any weight...i think he's too good at closing the distance &...
nah...he explained it perfectly well. you're just being a ****.
it's true. it's damn true. but now peterson will ko khan & make me look a fool. :good
if khan beats peterson; i don't see how you can have bradley with a better resume going by those rankings. k = 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12. b = 2,...
:nono kotelnik or alexander? judah or witter? malignaggi or cherry? holt or maidana? at least 3 of those go the way of the guy...
