Somewhere in my Top 20,Fergy. Am still making up my mind as to whereabouts but he's up there. Where would you place him?
Duran. He was just that bit better. Both men though were two of the greatest pound for pounders ever.
I concur and that's why Nigel gets my vote too. I've had the pleasure of meeting both men and I was n't disappointed with either.
No particular order - Frazier v Ali 1971 Ali v Foreman 1974 Duran v Leonard 1980 Hagler v Hearns 1985 Leonard v Hearns 1981
Two battling and exciting Brits. Who,though,would you all say is the better pound for pound?
Norton outboxes then stops Spinks after three or four rounds. Too strong and skilful.
Muhammad would have been great no matter what,imo. But Angelo definitely helped him a lot.
True. And also taking into account that George went into hibenation throughout 1975. Apart from that exhibition in Toronto.
Precisely. Muhammad should have had more voices in his ear telling him to retire after Manila.
Definitely. It would be like a larger Hagler-Hearns but would last longer.
I agree Fergy. It would a Fight of the Hypothetical Year,for sure. Ken had the style to break up Usyk's rhythm.
Definitely. There has n't been a heavyweight as good as Lennox since he retired. Although Usyk comes pretty near,imo. Would Usyk count as a...
1/ Oleksandr Usyk 2/ Vitali Klitschko 3/ Wladimir Klitschko 4/ Tyson Fury What do you all reckon? Numbers two and three are interchangeable...
Precisely this as far as I'm concerned. This is not to take anything away from Usyk who's the best heavy of his generation.
Gerry's career trajectory should have taken a different turn after he beat Ken Norton. His management should have taken the next logical step...
