well, hatton outweighed pac by 4 lbs. and we all know what happened. :deal
no. it just proves that pac is that good. hatton was the top guy @140 for 4 years, undefeated at that weight and was the larger guy. virtually...
why does pac have to fight the likes of guzman, valero and bradley for his last 2 fights if he can have 2 superfights w/ either floyd, cotto,...
pac already said that he has 2 fights left. do you think it would be worth it if pac uses these last 2 fights to fight guys like bradley, guzman...
and the hits keep coming.... :-(
actually it's from flyweight to super bantam. pac skipped 115 and 118.
not exactly #1... but "the man" of the division. to be the man, you have to beat the man which implies a lineage. barrera became the man @126 by...
barrera was stripped of his alphabet soup belts/titles but was still lineal champ when pac KO'd him in 2003. that's why i said that there is no...
no biggie as there are other 6-weight belt holders like hoya and floyd (or is floyd a 5-weight beltholder). but we are talking about championships...
exactly. :good
there is no belt/title that corresponds to the lineal championship. so, there is no such thing as an "uncrowned" lineal champion.
the ring title doesn't always correspond to the lineal championship. it does try to follow it closely but not always.
sasakul was 112 linear champ as well as WBC flyweight champ when pac KO'd him. and jmm wasn't linear champ @130. it was vacant. pac was rated #1...
Lewis and Benn
same move every time but got KD'd and hit by it every time too.
