Ok, parker isn't championship quality, in spite of the fact he was handed one for one fight. Neither was wilder, but wilder is American, so gets a...
As long as he can get a fight paying decent money once a year, he won't put any effort into his career.
it was obviously Parker. It showed what they had been hiding for a decade.
obviously he is making more money in the amateurs. none of the top guys are going to fight a dangerous opponent who brings no money when they can...
parker stinks. wilder hasn't a decent win to his name at 38. the new normal when guys only fight every 18 months or so against cherrypicked...
Wilder was umproven and Parker is proven mediocre. odds are they'll never fight the guys i mentioned because no one fights more than once a year...
Parkers still the same fringe contender he was last week. He just exposed a protected bum.
those guys are locked out by the promoters for a reason. were they brits or americans they'd be rolling in opportunities.
joyce and whyte already beat him. zheng or whatever his name is, guys like jalalov and dychko would destroy him but can't get a fight. etc....
thus why guys like fury and wilder need to at least fight twice a year, not the once every 18 months or so they do now to mitigate the probability...
which he will lose.
There was no good version of Stiverne. His best wins were a shot Arreola, Ray Austin, and Derick Rossy, lmfao. He was stopped by sub .500 fighter...
Parker is still a fringe contender, he just exposed Wilder.
Fury also got put down by Nevin Pajkic who had 5 career ko's. lmao.
Scotts best win was against a 44 year old Tony Thompson who in spite of losing the decision, still managed to floor Scott.
