good british level fighter,but rhodes will beat him,he is easy to hit and has nothing to upset rhodes with
:patsch i mean,i wouldnt like to meet them in a dark ally,but even now,id give em a good going over for a round or 2,even the 4 or 5 stone lighter...
[/B] well its about bloody time someone had a go at it,im sick of you drivel:D...
its not what he did what started it,i blame his father for impregnating his mother and i blame his mum even more for not having a abortion....
**** me, of course they were great,all were world champs,what the **** would you call them 'well,the were ok i guess' tell you what, ****witts...
that boy gone done some serious wanking today,bet the little fellow is all shrivelled up and red raw. bend over and squeal like a pig amir:tdh...
great thread,think i will go back to watching peter ****ing pan with my youngest than read this shite any more :tired
any of them really,all have there positives and negatives. ive gone for benn,cos he is possibly my fave fighter, aggressive,powerfull,good head...
pavlik would be a half decent fight for froch,but who knows pavlik apart from hardcore boxing fans,it won't sell at all in britain,he is a nobody...
glad ive read all that,makes you like the bloke more now,no excuse the best man won ect ect ,mr khan could learn a thing or 2 about that
:lol: aye,didnt it just:rofl
superb, i hope this concludes this stupid thread:deal:thumbsup
im glad you have the know how to upload pics like that old man. its absolute crap what everyone is talking,its like half of them have never...
i bet you thought Hitler had a base on the moon during WW2 so he could zap the allies with his 'allie zapping super duper lazer cannon' :beat
ive seen thousands of boxers leave there gloves on in the tv interview,for ****s sake
