nice. ill go toney.
i dont follow. but hey if u consider wins (robbery) against a 43yr old man + a disheartened and ill prepared eubanks evidence of his greatness...
There is a slow mo version of hopkins vs calz and it clearly shows bhop getting robbed. and its a bit sad that ppl consider his best win is...
but 43 of them were bums or corpses and 2 were debatable decisions with one being a robbery.
word.
are u sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kyA7Mgw-lI not saying mike can hit as hard but "not anywhere near" is a bad call.
tyson murders ali and foreman.
i see exactly what u mean and the bias nature did cross my mind. But it doesnt change what ali did after all fraiser had done for ali. How else...
just watched it last night. i have to say i have lost alot of respect for ali and gained a mountain of it for joe. It has left me wondering how...
sad. shane had the tools to be something really special.
yes he got sparked by both but thats wat i mean about the mind set. he was dominating ottke and woods 1, had no respect for them and in the end...
depends. If the man gets hit he might go down. At his peak and right mindset (not cocky and reckless) i can see him beating froch on points.
even i'm leaning toward andre ward and im a big choc fan. but mundine was quite a talent back in the day, to say he wouldnt win 1 round is harsh....
active - probably floyd. he can b a dick and has cherry picked crazy ways. but his skills are a joy. just 3 for all time is hard, so ill...
agreed.
