What the **** is wrong with you guys tonight? I'm on the 3rd page making post #38, and yet, I'm the first to mention; Arguello/Pryor I
Pavlik's 3-2 would be the key. People often totally miss how good he is with that lead left hook -- right hand. He beat the **** out of Lopez...
Has there ever been a fighter who seemed totally shot, but ultimately proved people wrong? I can think of a few, and I hope Jermain provides yet...
One thing Ali rarely gets full credit for is how freaking tough and resilient he was.
Not Tyson/Douglas surprising, and that's the benchmark I was thinking of.
And who the **** are you? I post facts and history. If I give an opinion, it's based on over 4 decades as a boxing fan. As near as I can tell...
I would have problems with a couple of the refs posters suggested. Nuemann worked the first Abraham/Miranda fight, and that should be all we need...
I assume we're talking about JT under Burns and looking good on the comeback trail.
Klitscho is the safe bet, but a Haye upset would not be all that surprising.
Bull****. He was 1 or 2 flush shots from taking Martinez out in both of the last 2 rounds. You'd have to be pretty damned biased and delusional...
I think it's just mind games, but a good ref is important. A biased ref could spell trouble for either fighter. GET SMOGER!!!!!
I find it odd that people who saw Bute fight Brinkley and Magee think he can just walk right over Kelly Pavlik. If Magee had real power, Bute...
"A lot of mass in that ring." Considering the girth found among todays heavyweights, that's probably an understatement. In the year 2011...
I totally agree. A 3rd Pavlik/Taylor fight would be pointless.
I did not say Steward ruined Taylor. I said Steward started his decline. Your post actually supports my position. Steward did not do anything...
