Yeah cos Fury's always knocking himself out isn't he.
My ranking criteria is to demonstrate that guys from the past were very beatable as was demonstrated by their losses to bums or fighters that lost...
U Provided he doesn't come up against the likes of Henry Cooper and those other bums who flattened him. He'd probably also be having his gloves...
Yes, a pretty good place to go when checking the records of fighters. You should have a look on there yourself.
They all lost to bums though, everyone is undefeated til they get beaten. The fact is they lost to bums, therefore they are overrated. If Fury had...
Ah how convenient. My suspicions were correct.
The same Norton who The same Norton who got whooped by Jose Luis Garcia? Now I know YOU'RE full of sht.
All of them. All lost to bums with multiple losses to other bums.
My point is...look at the records of the fighters in those 'great wins'. What made them so great? They'd have been considered bums in the modern...
My point about Ali's resume is as follows: Who said the guys Ali beat were any good in the first place? Surely they should be judged on the level...
So what bit of my criticism of Ali's resume did you disagree with?
You haven't answered my question. No doubt because "Ali was the greatest, cos he just was". Pathetic!
Have you ever even checked the resume of Ali's opponents? I'm already becoming rather suspicious that you are a member of the Ali would destroy...
The resume of pretty much everyone Ali beat was appealing, yet he is regarded as the greatest for some reason.
AJ was too busy getting bashed up by the Pilsbury Dough boy, it's obvious he wouldn't beat Fury in a month of Sundays. Usyk would've been...
