Historical fighters are not automatically better than their modern equivalents Multiple weight divisions are good and better than traditional 8...
Fought DLH, then fight Hatton, then fight Mayweather. That's as good a last three fight line up as you're gonna get, money wise and legacy wise....
Lacy needs to learn to box against some bums before he fights and gets beaten up by another elite fighter.
The Vargas that almost stopped Tito would surely stop Cotto.
What, three big, flush shots to break it? Look's like Khan's chin is pretty good. FAIL!
pacman is a special fighter, who can move up the weights and still be strong, fast, tough and powerful like very very few boxers are capable of....
Interesting vid. Mayweather was a master of inside fouling in that fight. However, he did it with such skill and finesse that you can't fail to...
as a side note i love the avatar... it's completely deceptive, showing what appears to be MAB battering Hamed but it is in fact Hamed dodging a...
How can it be between 70 and 200??!! the high end estimate is nearly TRIPLE the low end. That difference is massive and no honest journalist would...
You can still enjoy a boxing match while understanding that a part of boxing is corrupt. The two are not mutually exclusive.
If he fights a war with Pac and wins fairly then it would be impossible for him not to be praised. But if he holds excessively or uses dirty...
Respect to him for not going 'if kelly was fit he would have beat the **** out of nard'.
Calzaghe was surprised that this 'fight' against Jones did low PPV numbers so he clearly has no brains for promotion.
At 43 Hopkins is a NATURAL light heavy whereas Pavlik is a natural middleweight. Hopkins was two weights bigger than Pavlik, that's why he could...
done not even 300 sigs - thats poor come on boxing fans!
