Does his wins become no contests? Pretty obvious when look at him, looked like he walked out of a comic book. Makes it even funnier that he lost...
He's right about Froch. With his CV and drive he doesn't need to open his gob.
That round reminded me of Skelton-Dallas, with both Towers and Dallas just leaning over the ropes getting smashed. Towers was very very lucky to...
This thread was about Alex Arthur wasn't it? Don't know why Nelson has decided to turn it into another Burns argument thread.
Domestically he can still dominate. Webb, Rose, Arron, etc all very beatable.
Its also true all these guys who support you-know-who and claim this fight is mega-huge are hypocrites!
Isn't the Goldenboy part the reason why Groves went with ******? Isn't that why Hearn wasn't interested?
Bingo! Nobody gave a flying **** before the childish scuffle. Remember when Haye 'retired' and so many on here were saying there is no point...
I still can't believe so many on here are supporting him.
If the NC logic is right, so many fights would be declared that! Jones Jnr, Toney, Moseley?
Nice to have a all British clash without stupid childish antics.
Belts should be vacant, be nice to have WBA, IBF and WBC belts on line, the three biggest. But I doubt there should be a no-contest.
i sense a set up for a Pacquiao-Bradley trilogy...
How many world-class light-middleweights has Canelo fought?
A good under-the-radar fight! Is Hatton still gonna be in Rabchenko's corner?
