What's that got to do with losing to hunter ? Hunter is nothing special and bakole was shown up..
And the o.p made the thread to say look how great he is. And I pointed out when he stepped up he was exposed so I'm not really impressed with...
And the only time he's fought anyone of note he got exposed so....
And people were moaning when they thought it was Charles Martin These are the fights fury should have had before wilder and no one would have had...
Whyte banned, AJ exposed... If fury loses to wilder I might as well feck boxing off and go watch cricket.
I've never defended him. I don't know if he's guilty anymore than anyone else does. All I said is that he was cleared to fight and I didn't feel...
Like I said legally it's probably up to AJ but you can't force a man to do something he doesn't want to do. If Ruiz digs his heals in and says no...
I think the question is more can he get away with it. There's been loads of cases where athletes have got away with it with smart lawyers/doctors...
Actually thinking about it Contractually Ruiz is obligated to fight wherever joshua says. So technically he doesn't have a choice. In reality...
Hearn said yesterday the fight won't be in America. Ruiz doesn't have any say in it.
I don't see a moral issue with it. Because he was found not guilty by the board. If he was found guilty then of course but no I really don't see...
Exactly, they didn't tell Rivas because it would have put the fight in jeopardy. And if you were hearn or Whyte you wouldn't put the fight in...
It doesn't have to be justified and business doesn't have to be morally correct. The question shouldn't be should they have told Rivas the big...
Parker was close against whyte but chisora had 2 very close fights with Whyte also. He got sparked last time but was up on some cards at the time...
But what we have to remember is so far nothing has been confirmed. We have an allegation some rumours but all we know is he had a hearing and was...
