Proven and most dominant, probably. But Duran was more dominant. Infact, he was pretty well proven - I used to think his reign was a bit Bob...
Some people are underselling Gans. Let's not forget that he defended his lightweight title 14-17 times. Although that's not the important bit....
I don't, but it's entirely possible. Infact it'd bring a smile to my face if someone thought so. He was a brilliant champion and nobody really...
I'm most looking forward to bantamweight list. I wonder how many people will include kids Herman & Williams.
Not long left for the lightweight list - got any revisions? I'm thinking Sammy Mandell :?
As much as I despise Leonard also, he's a bit of an ace. Something you can pull from your sleeve to thrash the Trinidads, Mayweathers and...
You know when Cotto was running from Pacquiao, who had trouble landing? Leonard would be moving like that the whole night, except that whilst on...
This is what I've been saying for a while. He scored 51 knockouts in 59 wins, but he was already at the top level when he started that streak....
Thanks.
I didn't see it :lol:
27-0 (26) in 1937. Or 59-1-1 (51) from '37 to '40. EDIT: already beaten to it.
Of course I would. Just because I prefer the old days of boxing, it doesn't mean to say I'm going to criminally underrate the fighters of today....
Well, you don't know. I'd still bank on an Arguello win in a very, very good fight. As you say, he gets bashed around a bit.
Oh yeah... Not as confident with Arguello, however. Angles.
My gripe was the top twenty bit, not Pacquiao himself. He's got some great wins. But is he greater than Ray Leonard? He's my #21, so I use him...
