In terms of style, you could be right, but I think Haney brings a degree of combined size and athleticism and IQ that Loma will find burdensome...
Excellent points, all.
Thanks Willie! :thumbsup:
That could wind up becoming one of the biggest keys in the fight - winning the mini-battles in close.
Thanks Reignhardt. But the truth is, I still get'em wrong just as often (if not more often) than I get them right. :thumbsup:
I don't. There is absolutely no shame whatsoever in losing to an incredibly talented prizefighter like Loma (should things play out that way).
And he 100% deserved it. On another note, poor Gatti always gets mercilessly butchered in these threads, unfairly so in my humble opinion
For better or worse, my two cents for anyone interested. Cheers! [MEDIA]
[MEDIA]
He was a clear #10 in the results. He was a significant 122 points ahead of 11th place Tiger Flowers. And yet he was more than 300 points behind...
In case you were interested: Genaro was #24. Mandell was #15. Fields was #27.
I should have the 1920s video up on Sunday (along with my Haney-Lomachenko prediction video, should anyone be interested). I will close the 1930s...
