No. Because Vargas was a shell of himself when they fought. That's why he wasn't in the top 30 on any ranking while Corrales was ranked top 5 p4p.
Roy Jones can make heavy. He can't run through Tyson's resume. He's a bum.
Lies, lies and more lies.
I've been watching boxing since 1986. And Pea was one of the first boxers I watched. And he wasn't a better offensive fighter than Floyd.
Roy Jones was a HW at one time too.
Pernell Whitaker is top 10-15 IMO and definitely greater than Floyd. But he most certainly wasn't superior offensively.
Uhh...ya think?
No he lost. And secondly, why are you even debating like this. Mike Tyson would run through Roy Jones' resume - does that mean he should be rated...
No, he wouldn't have. For starters, I don't think a 2010 Oscar beats a 2010 Mosley. Furthermore, that's not how you judge resumes anyway.
LOL @ only one loss. Frankie Randall whupped his ass in 1993 and then they sh*tted on Randall in the rematch. Chavez was already a faded fighter...
Corrales is WAYYY higher than a Vargas win and slightly higher than a Quartey win. But given Floyd's performance against Corrales (as opposed to...
Maybe if Chavez was in his prime, I'd agree. He was not. At all.
So much controversy regarding Oscar bouts. What we do know is that the best opponent he clearly beat is Fernando Vargas. Or maybe Ike Quartey. And...
Would be an abominable fight. So are most of the fights I'm hearing Floyd taking. He's fought some solid opponents but no real threat since...
Only people who were robbed were the fans.
