yeah, that's exactly what i was going to say.
the way i remember it bean dominated and was close to stopping larry a few times.
who f'n knows but i like qawi too.
it was a **** fight but fury controlled every second.
i can agree on joshua but fury is a horrible matchup for wlad.
that's fair, i should have said that he was better than hatton overall. but he's closer to hatton than he is to naz.
hamed by a pretty long way. hatton can be compared to tszyu. hamed was the next level up.
langford but i'd make frazier a big favorite in either fight.
i agree. i think saying that was more about what young men in general were being sent to do.
he still is boxing but crawford. i was alive for his whole career but i kinda missed out there.
marciano was well under 6 feet and pretty limited. of course he loses to guys who are 6 inches taller and 50lb's heavier. who wouldn't?
the only way rocky could have proved more would be a hypothetical rematch vs charles but after 18 months and with at least a year of charles not...
it changes barkley's standing more than hearns i'd say. if those fights never happened i wouldn't think that hearns had a granite chin or that...
boxing is a part of his story but there are office workers who hit all his lowlights without ever getting hit in the head.
and then skynet knows which boxer i'm looking at? no thanks bro.
