Bowe did very little outside the Holyfield trilogy. Why would you think he could be compared with Lewis given his resume?
Vitali fought guys like Gomez and Adamek who possessed skills they weren't all primitive sluggers. If he was so repetitive why weren't they able...
I think he could be reasonably rated below Jeffries Johnson Louis Charles Marciano Liston Ali Holmes Tyson Holyfield Lewis Wladimir...
I don't see any argument for Holyfield being number 3. He simply doesn't have the dominance for it and lost the trilogy to Bowe. He also didn't...
He appears to have been pretty close to his prime in 1999 even if he didn't have the opportunity to prove it against good opponents. I didn't...
A lot of Foremans success seems to have been based on being the bigger stronger man if we transfer him to another era do we let him keep those...
The rating stems from his utter dominance in his other fights. So what if he lost to Lewis? That doesn't preclude him from being a H2H monster....
Who do you think? I think he could probably be favored over Corbett and Burns for example
You can't make a reasonable case for Wilders opponents being among the ten best in the world with the exception of Ortiz and Stiverne however....
Your being ridiculous. Mathis even at his best wasn't very good let alone the totally shot version that Lyle fought. I would assume several...
Tucker was shot when he fought Hide. Not an impressive win really
Some of those guys weren't even ranked in the top 10. Mathis and Ellis for example
Nothing wrong with 5 at all. Or did I misinterpret that. Wilder seems to be basically retired at this point anyway. I doubt we will be getting...
He somehow has missed out on virtually all the top contenders of his era. If that's okay than what is the point of having a heavyweight division...
I think many would reasonably argue that at the very least Wilder never proved himself better than Zhang and that his claim for being better is...
