There seems to be a good deal of controversy over lineage though. Some consider Holmes lineal some do not Some think Wladimir was lineal others...
He subsequently went on to consistently beat many heavyweights I would rate as better than Purrity and Brewster which makes me question the...
Based on what? Foreman was the bigger stronger man in his era and never faced any skilled shws. He's never faced anything like Wladimir a guy...
Not spending years holding the title hostage and refusing to face top contenders is a pretty low standard. If champions don't have to face the...
Except that depends on your view of lineage. Many feel you have to beat the best to retain lineal status and Foreman didn't do that which is why...
The public at large never viewed Briggs as the man so I would disagree. The public at large no longer saw Foreman as champ
But times change and people would not accept that behavior in later eras. Dempsey obviously would not be able to draw the color line either
I don't understand why Briggs is considered lineal by some people. Following the win over Moorer Foreman showed no interest in facing top...
H2h top 5 might be Lewis Holyfield Tyson Vitali Ibeabuchi
I don't think Louis fighting big guys is a very good argument given the quality of these opponents Look at who Carnera and Simon lost to for...
The 1999 Vitali h2h could be top 5
Wladimir Klitschko would probably have to be heavily favored on pedigree given his accomplishments I don't really see why this isn't a more...
Stewart didn't fight that many top guys there are probably plenty of guys who could have blown him away without any trouble whatsoever had he...
Terrell was good enough to beat Folley and Chuvalo and last the distance with Ali
If you had to make a top 20 list for both eras who would you have in it based on h2h
