Athletically he would and compete in any era. He's ring IQ would let him develop whatever style he thought would work best today it would be...
Fitz Ali Duran Walker
Even though I don't agree, everybody has their criteria and they are great fighters
Like the try, but poor execution
I think Quora is good for antiquity stuff, as the people who posts on those subjects are usually either well read on it, and many times even teach...
I doubt Mickey Ward had the best anything in boxing history
Of course he can, he's MAG, didn't you know Duran was never in decline... from 1968 till 2000 Duran was still as prime as ever.
1. SRR 2. Langford 3. Greb 4. Fitz 5. Charles That's using your criteria and weighing it heavily. Now if you ask me to give you the best...
Terrible referring in many regards, Chris made a very good post above, and touched on some reason why. I would also add the lack of points...
Quick question... what robbery vs. Johnson?
I think we understand each other pretty well, and I do get the point you're making. It's a fair point overall. In the end, we both agree for the...
It could also be that Weaver and Frazier didn't present the same offensive and defensive problems that Norton presented to Holmes, and thus Holmes...
Casual!!!!!
My problem here is, he likely already did enough to win. You even admit Norton looked far better of the two. If you think you're looking far...
BWAHAHAHA... If I did, I would have a serious identity crisis, being that I'm half Latin American!! lol
