Cherry picking?excuse me, but at 21 patterson weighed in the 180s range always and Charles in the 160s range and it is a fact, not cherry picking...
Patterson at 21 weighed 180s and charles 161. 20 pounds of difference
Hearns by ko 100/100 times
Mugabi,jackson and benn very dangerous fights for chinny hearns
I thought that i said at 21 not 20 He weighed 161 Also at 21
Charles weighed also 161 at 21(you are cherry picking higher weights) . and he started his career at 157 pounds, patterson never ever weighed that...
Charles 160
No está mal. Correcciones. *la aplicación. *puntuación El español es un idioma mucho más difícil que el inglés
Really? Tengamos una conversación. Te voy a examinar en español lol
Liston was miles better hw than Charles and would destroy him like an insect h2h
Because it was an added factor, not the only reason. Patterson would not be the smaller fragile guy here
It had nothing to do with the fantasy fight,this one was another debate, mcvey understood that i never suggested that patterson would win cause...
You invented it,i never said that patterson would win cause he was 10 pounds bigger.
I never ever said it I listed a lot of reasons. Styles Power+ speed And the "size" factor was one more. So basically you are inventing
And yes. Walcott was bigger than Charles NATURALLY
