this one is the motive. Trying to insinuate that Frazier would beat prime Ali, a rusty version of Ali was very competitive against a peak Frazier,...
No . he got exposed against whitaker badly. (Yes yes.. It was not prime chavez blahblah). It would be funny to see how mad would be the chavez...
I am not interested in fighting a cyber war with a stupid troll with too much free time. Ignored. Now keep talking alone
it is false. My point was that Liston never fought an animal like Tyson and this time he was in fact"smaller" than Tyson, i am not talking about...
This numbers are a complete bull****. We have eyes and Tyson was thicker wider than Liston, more Compact stronger legs and wider back, stop...
Bro.. You know i respect you but this one is a biased post.(advantages of Liston) really?. In Strength you could be right.. Liston could have more...
No John no, Liston was 1.84 it is = 6'0 1/2 not 6'1. And I don't buy that Tyson was 5'10. He have been listed at 5 '10 , 5'11 and even 6'0 y some...
Yeah i know that you are a Frazier fan but i disagree strongly, Prime Ali beats Frazier every time,a rusty Ali was competitive against him
:lol:
Ali in his peak in 1963? Because you need to say that henrry cooper did hurt Clay so then you could say that Marciano could beat Ali right? Lmao
Funny " norris would have destroyed Trout and Lara and they gave Canelo big problems" So your argument is based on your opinion about fantasy...
Lol
3" taller? Lol Tyson was 5"11 and Liston 6'01/2 That negates any weight difference?then thomas Hearns should beat David Tua or Marciano right? I...
Tyson Was bigger faster and stronger and did hit harder too. He was more skilled,he had better deffence, he had better more proven chin,his legacy...
And there is no "maybe" about Tyson having better and wider arsenal of blows overall and being much better and more complete boxer overall
