Serious talks apparently for trout v delvin rodriguez on either hbo or a BAD card Late november. Good fight.
Phils IBO business card says: Phil Austin marketing and sales
Good point about burn's weight. A few question marks in this fight. On face value, fighting katsidis first go at lightweight is not recommended...
I agree 100% too ty.
Katsidis v soto has been discussed as an uc for kirkland v angulo on Nov 5. But hbo would prefer matthyse v soto.
Spot on. He didnt need to rematch him and wouldnt get **** for not pursuing it. But when he comes out with the lamest reason for why he cant...
And huck isnt a big enough name but wlodarczyck is??? He must be talking about the number of letters.
If thats true then danny saying this about tarver is :lol: :lol: :lol: "Unless he's not much of a big deal back home - maybe he's talking it...
:roll: "Unless he's not much of a big deal back home - maybe he's talking it up and he really isn't much of a big deal. LOL, danny musnt be much...
I guess the pressures of promoting only apply to rematches with the guy who kicked the **** out of him.
True about the ibo ty.
I think broner would work him out quickly ( broner studies his opponent then gets to work).
I think the plan is for tomlinson to win the ibo belt and then become the mando to face broner for the wbo belt.
Been told tomlinson will contest the vacant ibo title against argie vincente rodriguez.
I wasnt overly impressed with frampton watching that. Few bad habits there, i dont think he's fast enough or has the head movement to fight with...
