people tend to think because you're a boxer you cannot take down someone or defend yourself in a takedown. that's bull****. even if fedor is...
lol. tyson is a freak of nature. even if you're so good and skilled in MMA you're options are limited when a beast that could crack comes straight...
so forbes may be a better boxer, pac is a better fighter and would make a better account for himself than forbes.
is this for the pac-dlh fight in case pac wins? hehe you beat me to it. i was supposed to make this after reading your cotto exposed thread
hey, that was guyton can't you read?:yep
in three years, mijares has already been beaten by donaire. so its pavlik
bring it on! now everyone wants hatton for pac when just a month ago hatton-pac is a thing for humor.
after a succesful bout at 126 lbs. gamboa should be making a championship match at featherweight after one or two more fights, preferably against...
well if pac gets dominated by guzman after he lose to DLH, there's no other better explanation than pac being shot due to DLH. because aside form...
pac is retiring soon. this fight is a win-win situation for him. big money. get a win and he just got the biggest win in his career, puts him in...
well like roach always says, 2-pounds fought and did well against oscar. pac would have done better.
hopkins used to punch in combos when he was still a stalking fighter. now he backpedals, outwaits his opponents, throw a right or left and hold...
pavlik by decision or maybe a KO. hopkins can't fight this young bomber who would outwork him just like what taylor did. this time with bigger...
edwin valero ought to be the fighter he'd meet on nov. had it not been for medical reasons
..and take pictures from the future too.
