it read as though you were admitting to acting deliberately obtuse. i think frampton wants it, just on terms that suit. it'll still happen, and...
ah, so you're in solaris mode!
absolutely, yet somehow you appear to have missed it. cyclone are desperately trying to get a foot in the door at sky, matchroom are equally...
not for smith! 3 successive title fights after such a distinctly underwhelming career represents great business.
revisionist nonsense! schaefer tried to buy oscar out of his own company!
the king of spin returns. shane warne has nothing on you. the 2 situations are not ana|ogous. while i disagree with the actions of main events...
close but clear suggests otherwise to me. as others have intimated, judges are reticent to apply the must system as flexibly as it could be.
:good
if 1 boxer shades 8 rounds and his opponent wins 4 clear you've got a draw. is this fair? i'm unconvinced.
...or zero reward.
that must be why quigg swerved galahad when challenged.
don't hold your breath, quigg swerved galahad, don't expect him to go anywhere near rigo!
they were heavy going. no, the point is lee may turn down the most money to rematch in his opponent's hometown, the same as ward did. and...
this thread just keeps on giving!
don't do it to yourself!
